Exotic High Tech Explosives Positively Identified in World Trade Center Dust

Editor, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

A ground-breaking scientific paper confirmed this week that red-gray flakes found throughout multiple samples of World Trade Center (WTC) dust are actually unexploded fragments of nanothermite, an exotic high-tech explosive.

The samples were taken from far-separated locations in Manhattan, some as early as 10 minutes after the second tower (WTC 1) collapsed, ruling out any possible contamination from cleanup operations.

Authored by an international team of physicists, chemists, and others, the research paper was titled “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe.” It was published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Vol. 2., and is available online for free download. The lead author is Niels H. Harrit of the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen.

The paper ends with the statement, “Based on these observations, we conclude that the red layer of the red/gray chips we have discovered in the WTC dust is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material.”

Ordinary thermite burns quickly and can melt through steel, but it is not explosive. Nanothermite, however, can be formulated as a high explosive. It is stable when wet and can be applied like paint.

The presence of pre-planted explosives in the WTC buildings calls into question the official story that the buildings were destroyed by the airplane collisions and fire alone. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the official government agency that investigated the building collapses, did not test for residues of explosives.

Richard Gage, AIA, said, “This peer-reviewed scientific study of the disturbing contents of the WTC dust is yet another smoking gun proving to the over 600 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) who I represent that a real investigation must be carried out immediately as to the actual cause of the destruction of the three WTC high-rises on 9/11.”

One of the paper’s co-authors is AE911Truth researcher/editor Gregg Roberts. When Roberts signed the AE911Truth petition demanding a new 9/11 investigation, he wrote, “What struck me on 9/11 was how much dust was created.” Now, over seven years later, Roberts has an intimate appreciation for that dust. The steel was removed and destroyed very quickly after the catastrophe, despite loud protests from fire fighters and others. It was destruction of the primary evidence at a crime scene. The dust, however, remains as a key piece of physical evidence.

The nine co-authors are Niels H. Harrit, Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Jeffrey Farrer, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University; Steven E. Jones, S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT; Kevin R. Ryan, 9/11 Working Group of Bloomington, Bloomington, IN; Frank M. Legge, Logical Systems Consulting, Perth, Western Australia; Daniel Farnsworth, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University; Gregg Roberts, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Berkeley, CA; James R. Gourley, International Center for 9/11 Studies, Dallas, TX; and Bradley R. Larsen, S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT.

[For more information watch: 9/11: Blueprint for Truth—The Architecture of Destruction, With Richard Gage, AIA,]

—Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, April 5, 2009